With the first three iPhone applications now available to serve up scholarly papers from the arXiv.org repository of scientific papers, mobile computing has now officially entered the domain of scholarly communication and is poised to demonstrate the inevitability and superiority of Open Access publishing. What's more, the appearance of bonafide scholarship on smartphones will accelerate the metamorphosis of modern scholarship because the social, geographic, and interactive aspects of mobile computing are going to reshape research, field work, peer review, and the integration of scholarship into formal and informal teaching and learning.
Of course educationally-oriented content, media, and applications abound for smartphones, and of course any Internet-enabled mobile device has been able to reach Google Scholar and countless other scholarly resources. But dedicated applications for direct access to full-text authoritative publications change the game, especially when we understand these applications as more than just e-readers or as a convenience on the same order as faculty document delivery service from the library. These are not perfect applications, nor is arXiv.org the only scholarly repository, but together they have crossed a key threshold for scholarly communications and set the stage for things to come.
For years scientists have been posting their work to a "pre-print server" or online repository known as arXiv.org. Hosted by Cornell, the repository now holds a half million articles in subjects ranging from mathematics to physics to optics and statistics. The site has no mobile version, but it has an open API and RSS feeds that have allowed entrepreneurs to begin making applications for serving up that storehouse to the mobile web. The three applications to date are Greg Landweber's "arXiv"; Daniel Kocevski's "ArXivReader"; and Dave Bacon's "arXiview." I don't intend to review or compare these applications here, yielding to Ian Douglas' able comparison in the Telegraph and to Kate Dohe's review of arXiview (the best of the three) at Macworld. Instead, I wish to consider the larger issue at hand: how mobile computing will prove a game changer for scholarship in general.
The first way mobile computing will change scholarship will be in multiplying, exponentially, the potential audience for learned communication. This will not occur on the model of the Wall Street Journal, currently charging $15/month for an electronic subscription on the Kindle. No, it will occur as the hardware (the portable smartphone) and software (apps like these three) unveil the latent power of Open Access scholarship--publications that are electronic and freed from commercial and licensing restrictions. Whereas the broadest circulating scholarly journal has readers in the tens of thousands (with far more having fewer than 10,000 subscriptions), any Open Access publication can potentially be reached by anyone with an Internet connection (approaching three billion). Of course a bare fraction of that potential audience will find or find value in any given work of scholarship, but the math on that works out pretty well. A bare fraction of billions is likely orders of magnitude more readers than the widest circulating scholarly journal. This is a math formula largely lost on the learned world, but it will not be once scholarship begins to be read more broadly. Indeed, were universities to realize the value of their intellectual output to those outside of the narrow channels of traditional academic publishing, they could generate income from business models based on amplified access (not on restricted access). But that's the subject of another post. The key to change is not to believe in the limited utility or interest in specialty knowledge. Academic vice presidents and university press editors need to read Chris Anderson's The Long Tail and Clay Shirky's Here Comes Everybody. The crowd is here, they have cell phones in hand, and they are hungry for more than Kanye West ringtones.
E-readers are already changing literacy by making more readers attracted to a greater range of texts, and this is certainly going to benefit scholarship as it has already benefited popular titles. Books have always housed the long tail of thought, but the effort to discover, pay for, or simply carry books has kept countless readers away from what they otherwise would enjoy. Now, a passing or casual interest can be rewarded with nearly instant and free (or cheap) texts. My computer programmer neighbor tells me about all the books he is reading on his Kindle that he never would have thought of seeking out. The technology, by making texts accessible, has created literary appetites and readerships unanticipated by book publishers. Of course the esoteric nature of scholarship provides an additional barrier, but one that may be more permeable than we might expect.
Digital scholarship today aims largely at the desktop Internet outlet, but the mobile audience is going to prove the more significant destination, due not only to the larger number of mobile than desktop computers, but due to the active and engaged nature of the mobile audience. You see, scholarship on mobile devices will move it from fossil to living status, productively blurring the lines between research and publication. Fossil scholarship is the intellectual paleontology that occurs whenever one researches content no longer being shaped or evolved by its authors. When Petrarch (living in the 1300s) wrote letters to Cicero (living 1400 years earlier), he was "responding" to Cicero, but only in a kind of metaphorical conversation. Cicero, so far as we know, never wrote him back. Unfortunately, because of the slowness of print, even living scholars have pretty much interacted with each other in the same way Petrarch did to Cicero, through the pseudo-conversations of one published idea "answering" another in a "dialogue" that has rarely approximated anything like the living back-and-forth that oral conversation allows.
But mobile computing pushes the real-time web and will make possible living, interactive research. Right now, as a pre-print server, arXiv.org makes it possible to keep current with what is being published in a given field through RSS feeds or discipline-specific pages that are date ordered to highlight current publications. It has begun to replace the traditional role of the scholarly journal by creating an online community that keeps track of one another's ongoing work. It is possible to find and email current scholars almost immediately upon their publishing something on arXiv.org. And because the posting of articles does not wait upon the long peer-review process, developments are more quickly shared. That speed and interaction is crucial to the building of knowledge, and thus the social and time-ordered nature of arXiv.org pre-prints accommodates a superior mode of scholarly exchange. All of that happens through a desktop interface. And while the mobile applications mentioned here are replicating these community features, their upgraded versions are bound to enhance and emphasize the "live scholarship" components of arXiv.org. A phone is built for rapid intercommunication. Scholarship that appears on a phone will naturally be drawn toward the interactive technologies and habits now making our mobiles more indispensible as information machines than as telephones.
In other words, mobile scholarship will be real-time, "living" scholarship because ultimately it will connect people involved in researching and publishing in real time. As I was writing this sentence, my iPhone chirped with a Twitter notification coming from Mike Zarro, an information architect and librarian at Drexel University, announcing Bruno Tassan's effort to preserve the Roman road, Via Aurelia, in the latest issue of the Smithsonian magazine and linking to Tassan's French website. I'd chosen to "follow" Zarro on Twitter precisely so I would be interrupted by his fertile and diverse notifications, and a five minute distraction from writing this post led me both to Zarro's website and to Tassan's, and the image of Roman soldiers marching along an endangered ancient roadway in Southern France. I'm grateful for both scholars and their three modes of communication (a print magazine, a website, a microblogging post). This is the tissue of living scholarship, and it is pulsing with blood like no print journal or PDF article could ever do disconnected from social media and our primary technology of choice, the mobile phone.
Can you sense what is coming? When applications like the three listed here are integrated with microblogging, we will have real-time research and collaboration. When repositories like arXiv.org are more integrated with social media, the communities it has already fostered will amplify with trackbacks to blogs and pings to cell phones. When profiles from online services like facebook or LinkedIn get integrated with academic CVs, scholarly identity will be in play more publicly than ever before. The walls of scholarship are coming down, and mobile computing is one of the loudest trumpets at Jericho.
It is an appropriate time to consider the fit or lack of fit between the traditional genres of scholarship and smart phone technology. Will cell phones become a significant, even dominant outlet for scholarly publishing? Will professors and academics use mobile devices as the work horses for their research workflows? Will we see the day when scholarship will not just be served up on handhelds, but produced there? Will the socially-enabled nature of mobile phones promote new modes of scholarly collaboration? new born-digital genres? Will there one day appear a way to use smart phones to conduct on-the-fly peer review? Will scholars adjust their style to reach a more popular audience in the way Dewey advocated years ago?
What is certain is that the smartphone will not limit its experiment with scholarship to the mere distribution and consumption of conventional scholarly publications. Hold on to your cell phones. The new era of scholarship is calling.