As I write this post on my iPhone (waiting at the doctor's office), I'm interrupted regularly by the tweets coming from @ScholarlyComm -- reporting live at Columbia University during a conference on the Future of Learned Societies. I'm glad to be a virtual participant, especially since my institution decided against observing Open Access Week, and this is a very exciting time for changing how scholars disseminate their work and conduct their research.
I'm going to send @ScholarlyComm a direct message in a second, suggesting he/she use a hashtag like #openaccessweek to be sure other audiences who would be interested in this conference can join in as I am, via electronic means. As this Twitter reporter sends snippets along, I take a second to search online about the speaker and the learned society he's affiliated with. At my mobile computer (now in a parking lot in my car) I may in fact be getting more out of this than if I were in the room in New York. I combine my listening with casual research that links this speaker's or this Tweeter's interests with mine.
I also am checking Twitterfall on my iPhone, set up to bring me real time tweets filtered on the hashtag #openaccessweek or #openaccess since I (like so many worldwide) am focusing on this topic this week and checking in on various events simultaneously occurring in celebration of Open Access. This is fun. In a couple hours a presentation on Open Access in the arts and humanities will be taking place at the University of Utah, and if no one tweets it live I'll get the near-live version online (Columbia is making their conferences, like past ones, freely available on iTunesU).
What an awesome time to be a scholar! Not only will I get up-to-the-minute thinking from like-minded people across the globe, but I can interact in real time (or nearly so) with those involved. I watch the Twitter names of posts that are meaningful to me, then, using Tweetie or another Twitter client application, I look up the person behind the moniker, check out his/her web page, and quickly find real colleagues. If they have invested in creating a web presence, I get a quick sense of their work and its relevance to me, and then I decide sometimes to comment on their blog, follow them on Twitter, or contact them directly -- all while seated in my car awaiting my son.
This is real time scholarly inquiry, and it has a value that complements and transcends traditional scholarly publication. The tools are only getting better and better for discovery, networking, data mining, networking, collaborating, representing findings and disseminating learned communication. I pity my colleagues trapped in the print paradigm. By the time a journal article appears (or even an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education), what they report on will be secondary to the real conversation. The real scholars are the real-time scholars. We use legacy knowledge systems and respect them for what they do, but we don't wait for them to fossilize the conversation; we're too busy growing live knowledge with the more intellectually agile tools of mobile phones, microblogging, and live update streams.
"I pity my colleagues trapped in the print paradigm. By the time a journal article appears (or even an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education), what they report on will be secondary to the real conversation."
This reminds me of a bit on The Colbert Report, where the 'investigative reporter' asks the editor of a major metropolitan daily newspaper why they bother to print "old news".
It is, indeed, a great time to be a scholar.
Posted by: Lisa | October 22, 2009 at 02:39 PM